Monthly Archives: November 2010

Misconception Monday: 401(k) Returns

I got a question recently that I want to share. It’s rare to find someone that has such a unique question that nobody else can learn from it.

I was speaking to someone about retirement accounts and the options for investing for someone in their 20s. Of course, the first thing I suggested was the mandatory 401(k) match, followed closely by the Roth IRA. In this specific case, there was no match available, just a traditional 401(k). So he wanted to know how much he could make investing with Lending Club, and IRA, and a 401(k).

We talked a little bit about how the Lending Club returns can be great, but is a little more involved as you have to choose the specific loans you want to invest in.

Then came the big question:

“So how much does a 401(k) make?”

Time for a quick refresher: You should always have control over your investment accounts. Whether you want to take risks with the hopes of earning higher investment returns is up to you, but almost all investment options come with variable returns.

You can’t simply say “I want to earn 7% each year, so I’ll invest in an index fund that tracks the S&P 500.” In some years it will work out, but in others it won’t.

Within a 401(k), there are many investment options. My options include some very conservative options, some benchmark index funds, and even some more risky funds that track emerging markets. I chose a nice mix, but people in different stages of their life will make different choices.

So the answer to the question?

There is no set return for a 401(k) (or IRA or other investment account), and the risk/reward is completely up to you.

The other lesson to be learned here is that investment options shouldn’t affect the type of account where you invest your money. Instead, the tax advantage and flexibility should be the major factors that affect your decision.

For example, a Roth IRA is great both for the tax benefits AND the flexibility of being able to withdraw contributions (and only contributions) at any time. And in my situation, the investments options are the same, so these two factors are the only ones that affect my decision.

Readers, what affects your decisions on how to invest? Which investment vehicle is your favorite?

Nothing’s More Fun Than Columns Of Numbers

Greg McFarlane is an advertising copywriter who lives in Las Vegas and Lahaina. He recently wrote Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense, a financial primer for people in their 20s and 30s who know nothing about money. Check out both the physical book and the Kindle version and feel free to contact Greg at Greg at ControlYourCash dot com.

Last month the folks at Money Under 30 graciously allowed me a few kilobytes in which to explain how income statements work, punctuated by the softest of softcore images. Some diligent readers even made it to the end of the post. For them, here’s Part II in a cross-blog trilogy. If you’re joining late, don’t worry. You should be able to jump right in and follow. I’ve included cute animal pictures to break the monotony, two of a puppy and kitten and one of kit foxes.

The balance sheet is the second of the three major financial statements. The first one, the income statement, tells you how much money a company took in and how big a profit it generated. The balance sheet tells you the size of the company, measured by taking its assets and subtracting its liabilities. The difference is called shareholders’ equity and is as helpful a measure as any of the worth of a company.

You don’t have to be Oracle or Bristol-Myers Squibb to have a balance sheet. This works on the micro level, too. Your net worth is your own assets minus your own liabilities. It’s one reason why our mantra at Control Your Cash, repeated until people cry for some respite from hearing it, is buy assets, sell liabilities. Do that often enough and you’ll get rich in spite of yourself.

The word asset has a favorable connotation, but you can’t look only at the positives without giving the negatives comparable attention. With a balance sheet, you don’t. Hence the equal mention of liabilities. Tim Couch won 22 games as an NFL quarterback. Good for him, but he also lost 37.

If you buy up everything in sight – other companies, discounted factories, raw materials to make whatever it is your company makes, you’ll grow your assets and theoretically be halfway to increasing the size of your company. If you borrow and mortgage your future to get your hands on those assets, you’ll increase your liabilities, too. Net gain to your balance sheet, nil.

This is a killer example of how true wealth can differ radically from apparent wealth. We’re all familiar with the stereotype of the bon vivant with the ostentatious car, indulgent house and impressive array of passport stamps; the person whose corresponding 12% dealer financing, interest-only mortgage and 5-digit American Express bill are slightly less visible.

There’s nowhere to hide those last items on a balance sheet. If your company turns a profit, it’s reflected in your shareholders’ equity. If the assets are yours, as opposed to yours with some help from the credit department, ditto.

One big difference between the income statement and the balance sheet is the length of time each one refers to. Obviously, knowing income doesn’t tell you much unless you associate it with a particular period. Convention dictates that we use a year or, less frequently, a quarter.

A balance sheet doesn’t operate under the same restraints. We’re not measuring what came in and went out, we’re measuring what’s on hand as we speak. At any given picosecond, Company X is going to have a certain amount of assets it owns, and a certain amount of liabilities it owes. A minute later those numbers can change, but the concept of instantaneous shareholder’s equity will be as valid then as it was before. It makes sense to say that an income statement refers to the period January 1 – December 31, but that wouldn’t make any sense for a balance sheet. Instead we’d say that a particular balance sheet was effective on December 31.

We used Microsoft for our income statement example, so we might as well use them again for the balance sheet:

Current assets are cash (the most current asset you can have) and its equivalents. What’s an equivalent? Well, if your company makes enough money and thus has enough cash lying around, it doesn’t make sense to just stick it in a drawer somewhere. Instead, the company will spend it on certificates of deposit, maybe government bonds. It’ll earn tiny interest, but if the principal is big enough the return can buy bagels for the break room or covered parking for the executives.

Accounts Receivable is money coming in – stuff the company is owed for but hasn’t gotten yet. That’s not unusual. Most companies, if their orders are big enough, expect 30, 60, 90, maybe 120 days to get paid.

Inventories, as you might imagine, refers to goods the company has possession of but hasn’t yet sold. A company like Home Depot* has plenty of inventories, mostly as a result of its market category: a lumber warehouse without any unsold lumber on the premises couldn’t stay in business long. But Microsoft’s products are easy and fast to replicate. Inventory of this year’s Office Suite wouldn’t take up much space, thus Microsoft inventory numbers are low.

That’s it for current assets, mostly. Other assets include property and equipment, which is hopefully self-explanatory. Equity, in the case of Microsoft’s asset column, means investments in other companies’ stock. Goodwill could use a post unto itself, but it’s the difference between what another company’s assets were valued at and what Microsoft paid for them. (Microsoft would have overpaid to avoid losing out to someone else on those assets.) Intangibles are copyrights, patents etc.

Now on to liabilities, again divided among current and other. But first, a puppy and kitten.

Current means it’ll be resolved, ideally, within a year. Accounts payable is the mirror image of accounts receivable, money the company owes for services rendered or goods received and that’s due either immediately or within 30, 60, 90 or 120 days. Short-term (and later on the balance sheet, long-term) debt is money the company borrowed, while accrued compensation is just salaries and benefits owed to contracted employees. Unearned revenue refers to stuff that the company has been paid for but hasn’t yet delivered (as an independent businessman, I assure you that this is the smallest entry on my personal balance sheet.) Securities lending payable is a rare category that only Microsoft and a few other companies use: it refers to Microsoft borrowing stocks and bonds from other companies. (Tax laws treat this more favorably than they do a straight loan of cash.)

Finally, commitments and contingencies are debts the company owes and money set aside for debts the company might owe, respectively. Microsoft was the plaintiff in one of the biggest lawsuits in history in the late 90s, and who knows? There might again come a time when people become too dumb to change out the browser that comes with their operating system.

Subtract liabilities from assets, and we get shareholder’s equity. It’s the total of the company’s stock, plus its paid-in capital (which is stock sold to investors directly from the company, rather than in the stock market.) It also includes retained deficit, which is the losses the company suffered and didn’t distribute to its shareholders – a piece of minutiae you don’t need to concern yourself with.

Today’s homework assignment? Figure out your own assets and liabilities. No one reading this post will bother to, of course, but if you do you’ll know your net worth. And be in a far better position to further increase those assets while reducing the liabilities.

*We’re not going to call it The Home Depot when there are 2000 of them.

Is Black Friday Worth It?

I dot know what I find more disturbing about Black Friday, the crowds that have actually trampled people to death or the fact that our culture celebrates materialism during the Christmas season? But I guess that’s neither here nor there for this article, in which I will be analyzing whether or not Black Friday is even worth it.

Here are 3 things you should consider:

1. Time vs. Savings?

At some stores, people camp outside starting days before in order to snag the “hottest” deals. This is something I’ve never quite understood. I suppose if I were unemployed or retired, it might make sense in some situations. But is it really worth camping out for 12-24 hours to buy some TV for $599 + tax from Wal-Mart, when you can probably go online and find one for a little more (or wait a few months) without the hassle?

The point I’m trying to make is that time truly does equal money. If you are missing hours you could be earning a wage, you need to take that into account and determine if the savings will actually be worth it.

2. Is The Deal Just An Illusion?

As I’m writing this, it’s just a couple days before Black Friday. Guess where I was today? At the local mall. Much to my surprise, there were major markdowns at the department stores which were far more impressive than what I saw on Black Friday in 2008 (and that was during the financial meltdown, when there was supposedly very deep discounting).

For example today at Bloomingdales (which is normally way out of my price range) there were racks everywhere that had 40% off the already reduced prices. Most of those items had already been reduced once or twice. I got a name brand jacket that was originally $99 for only $24. I was speaking with the associate and she told me off the record that their deals on Black Friday aren’t even close to being their best.

In a nutshell, you may come across a few items on Black Friday that are truly a deal, but most of what you see is nothing but perceived markdowns. Don’t believe me? Then just run the numbers yourself and compare the prices to the millions of other sales throughout the year. Retailers know shoppers stampede through the doors on Friday morning with the mentality to buy, buy, buy so in actuality, the store doesn’t have to give a deep discount because they know you’re mind is already made up, you’re there to spend money!

More Gadgets, Gizmos and Sweaters?

Even if something is a deal, do you really need it? So what if that cashmere sweater is only $60, you will probably only wear it a couple times per year. The same applies to buying gadgets. When I was a teen I was obsessed with technology. Every year for Christmas I would ask for various gizmos (think Sharper Image) and you know what?

Looking back, I would hardly get any use out of the stuff, plus it would be outdated a year or two later anyway! Luckily I grew out of that wasteful gadget addiction by the time I became an adult, but even now I find myself buying things once in a while that just don’t get enough use. For example, I bought a food dehydrator last year and have only used it twice. Sure, I only paid $22 for it, but that’s still money that could have been better spent!

Don’t Get Caught Up In The Excitement

It’s important to not get caught up in our culture’s unhealthy addiction to consumerism. There’s nothing wrong with saving money on a purchase, but it only makes sense if it’s something you actually need.

Most important of all, ask yourself this question when you’re buying something; Do I really need this? Or could this money be better spent helping someone else? $60 could be spent on a cashmere sweater you will hardly wear, or it could be spent through World Vision to buy 10 ducks for a poor family overseas, which will produce hundreds of eggs to help feed them year-round. Which would you rather have?

This post was written by guest blogger Michael D. from CreditCardForum.com, a site that he created to give consumers a platform to write credit card reviews (both good and the bad) via an uncensored message board. Although Michael does enjoy his cash back credit cards, he strongly cautions people to stay away from credit cards if they’re going to tempt you to carry a balance.

Pets: A Bigger Expense Than Expected

The following is a post by staff writer Crystal at Budgeting in the Fun Stuff. Her blog covers living expenses, saving for your future, and the fun stuff along the way.

My Beginning

I grew up surrounded by animals. My mother and I lived next to my grandparents in the middle of a forest for the first 4-5 years of my life, so we had tons of room for pets. I remember multiple rabbits, a ferret, two geckos, a grass snake, a billion guinea pigs, a hamster, a cat, and three dogs.

Now that I’m an adult and actually see what my two dogs cost, I have no idea how we afforded to eat back then, lol. When my husband and I drove to the Houston SPCA about a month after our wedding, I assumed we’d spend a few hundred up front and then simply cover the cost of food, flea prevention, and heartworm prevention. I was so naive…

Our First Dog

Miss Doxie, our first dog, really is an inexpensive blessing. She was given to the HSPCA since her older owner needed to move somewhere that didn’t accept pets. This meant that we got a 7 year old dog that was already fully trained and completely healthy for $75 in 2005. She is also a mutt, which means that she doesn’t have many problems that full-blooded Dachshunds usually have to deal with in their teens.

In 5 years, we have “only” spent about $2000 on keeping her healthy, happy, and fed. She has needed a few vet visits, a major teeth cleaning, food, flea prevention, heartworm prevention, a bottle of doggy aspirin, and a bottle of glucosamine tablets for her joints. That is pretty much it.

Our Second Dog

We adopted our second dog, a 6 year old Pug, in February 2009. Mr. Pug is not nearly as low-maintenance. We got him from Pughearts: Houston Pug Rescue and immediately ran into a few small problems like ear infections and skin-fold issues. I thought that the first $200-$300 in vet visits would have gotten us to the happy maintenance phase, but I was sorely mistaken.

In the last year, Mr. Pug has had a minor tumor removed, 7 teeth extractions, and developed food allergies so severe that he will be on meds for the rest of his life. His adoption fee was $200, and we’ve easily spent $2500 since then on vet visits and medicines alone. Now that he is 99% healthy, his maintenance drugs and food will run a minimum of $500 a year from here on out.

In short, he is an expensive but awesome pup. I may never adopt a Pug again, but I have added his needs into our monthly budget from here on out. I truly enjoy his perky company.

Conclusion

I am not trying to advocate spending thousands of dollars on pets, but I did want to point out that pets can be way more expensive than expected. By basing all of my expectations on our perfectly healthy Dachshund mutt, I was unpleasantly surprised every step of the way with my allergy-ridden Pug. I seemed to take offense at every single vet bill and medicine needed to keep him as healthy and bouncy as possible. I shouldn’t have expected the luck of perfection.

Have you ever been caught off-guard by pet expenses? How much do you usually spend every year on your pets or have heard about someone spending on their own?