Monthly Archives: May 2010

Best of the Rest: Memorial Day Edition

I’m sure you’re all super excited for your extra day off, as am I. Enjoy the barbeque!

This week I posted about the choice of choosing debit vs. credit, and one commenter asked about how to get credit cards. Jim from Bargaineering wrote a very relevant post about to analyze credit card reward programs. LBergs, this one’s for you!

Mrs. Micah wrote about whether we should let people know how we’ll we’re doing financially. It’s pretty interesting that people are much more willing to open up if they’re NOT doing well, and there’s a thin line between talking and bragging. What do/would you do if you had a lot of money?

Flexo asks whether you would pay more for the personal touch of local stores. For most things, I’m fine with buying them online, but if there’s something I must check out, I don’t mind testing a product in the store and then buying it online. In his case, did the personal touch make a $500 difference?

Aaron from Clarifinancial talks about life insurance and marriage. Congratulations on 7 years and let this be a reminder to think about why you need life insurance.

I participated in one carnival recently, the Yakezie Carnival over at Free From Broke. Thanks for hosting, you did a wonderful job!

Interview with Rick Rodgers & Giveaway!

After reading Rick Rodgers’ book, The New Three-Legged Stool: A Tax Efficient Approach To Retirement, I was left with a great understanding of retirement accounts, but I also had a few questions for Rick about his thoughts on retirement in the future as well as a thirst for interesting stories.

Rick was nice enough to take the time to answer a few questions for us and offer another book to give away to one of our lucky readers. Giveaway details are below.

What is your approach to retirement planning? What are the benefits of this?

My approach to financial planning is to look for ways to establish efficiencies in all aspects of a person’s finances - debt management, investing, insurance, estate planning, risk management, etc. Retirement planning is just one part of financial planning. In order to establish effective efficiencies you need to view all the elements of your finance affairs together. My book focuses on tax efficiencies for retirement planning. Taxes are important but so are costs and risks. I believe a person should establish a goal for retirement and then develop a strategy to reach the goal taking the least amount of risk and paying the least amount of taxes.

A good analogy would be to envision driving a car from New York to Los Angeles. You would want to have a map before you begin the trip. That is your financial plan. You would probably want to take the most direct route in order to minimize time and fuel expenses. Choosing a car that is fuel efficient and has been well maintained will minimize expenses. You will also need to be prepared to make adjustments as needed to avoid weather problems, detours that you weren’t expecting, etc. Retirement planning works the same way.

The original three-legged stool for retirement planning believed that a solid retirement was based on having three legs to generate retirement income – a pension, Social Security, and personal savings. This approach doesn’t work anymore. Private pensions cover less than 20% of the working class. Those pensions that are still in existence are under funded and will most likely be discontinued. Social Security is expected to run out of money soon. And personal savings will need to be invested differently to finance 30+ years of retirement. The New Three-Legged Stool builds a solid retirement income using three different legs to generate income – after-tax savings, tax-deferred savings (IRAs, and 401(k)s), and tax-free savings (Roth IRAs). By properly building a retirement based on the new three legs, you can craft your income to minimize or eliminate income taxes. Having tax-free income in retirement means you don’t have to save as much to fund it.

Creating efficiencies in your finances will provide you with more consistent investment returns reduce your income taxes and save you money. That’s my approach in a nutshell.

What do you think the state of Social Security will be 30-40 years from now?

I will begin my quoting from The 2009 OASDI Trustees Report, officially called “The 2009 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds,”

Conclusion – Under the long-range intermediate assumptions, annual cost will begin to exceed tax income in 2016 for the combined OASDI Trust Funds. The com bined funds are then projected to become exhausted and thus unable to pay scheduled benefits in full on a timely basis in 2037. The projected trust fund deficits should be addressed in a timely way so that necessary changes can be phased in gradually and workers can be given time to plan for them. Implementing changes sooner will allow their effects to be spread over more generations. Social Security plays a critical role in the lives of 52 million beneficiaries and 160 million covered workers and their fami lies in 2009.

The Trustees are warning you to make other plans. What you see in Social Security benefits today is not what it is going to look like down the road. The program will ultimately be means tested in my opinion. Social Security will be there only for those that have no other leg to stand on.

What is the most common mistake you see people make when planning (or not planning) for retirement?

The most common mistake is not planning. For those that do plan, the most common mistake is not saving tax efficiently. I wrote The New Three-Legged Stool to address this issue specifically. We have been told for years to tax defer your income because you will be in a lower tax bracket when you retire. This has worked well for a lot of people up to now because income tax rates have steadily declined. I do not believe that will be the case going forward. The Bush tax cuts are scheduled to expire in seven months. President Obama says he will only raise taxes on families making more than $250,000. I doubt he will be able to keep that promise. If you want to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement you will need to plan for it. You will need to build a new three-legged stool.

Think of it this way. If you save $1 million for retirement and it is all in your 401(k) the day you leave work, every penny you try to spend will be taxable. You will lose at least 20% to income taxes depending on what state and local taxes you may incur. Saving the same amount tax efficiently will either give you 20% more income or you won’t need to save as much to have the same income. You could net the same income with $800,000 in savings giving you the option to possibly retire sooner.

The most interest parts of the book are the way you illustrate your point with examples, some of which are pretty extreme and frightening. What’s a good story that makes people wake up and realize that we should be active in our retirement planning?

I open the book with the story of Frank Richardson which has to be the most compelling reason to be actively planning. Frank was a great businessman and an exceptional visionary when it came to the lumber business. I’m sure in his mind he believed that he had plenty of money saved that he didn’t need to worry about planning. That was partially true. He died without running out of money. Unfortunately his lack of planning allowed the IRS to take 80% of what he tucked away in his retirement account.

An overlooked benefit of retirement planning is the experience and discipline that you develop by doing it. I had a client that passed away a couple years ago that accumulated a $2 million estate. They left everything to their two sons equally. Both sons were in their 50s, educated and had good careers. Neither of them had been working with a financial planner when they received their inheritance and they both hired my firm to manage their finances. One son had already accumulated over $500,000 on his own. The other had no savings. The son that had money before the inheritance has continued to save and is planning to retire at the end of this year. The other son has spent principal time and again. He panicked in the 2008 market drop and sold some of his stock positions causing him to lock in losses that may never be recovered. He has less than $250,000 left and will probably never be able to retire. You can’t handle a lot of money until you’ve learned how to manage small amounts of money well.

Thanks Rick for your insight!

The Giveaway!

We’re giving away one copy of the book. There are three ways to earn entries:

Sign up for the RSS feed or email feed (leave a comment letting me know!) – 1 entry

Follow me on twitter and retweet this message: “Rick Rodgers Interview & Giveaway! http://ow.ly/1qyBy3 (via @DanielPacker)” – 1 entry

“Like” my Facebook page (This will also enter you in all future Facebook giveaways) – 1 entry

Entries close June 6th and a winner will be randomly chosen by random.org.

Tips on Budgeting – Good and Bad Debt

For many people debt is unavoidable. Even some of the wealthiest people on the planet struggle with their finances. One important thing to know is that there is a difference between good debt and bad debt. This post will help you discover how to manage money and ease your way into being debt free.

Some quick tidbits about debt that are frightening:

  • Around half of Americans spend more than they earn every year.
  • The typical household carries more than $10,000 in credit card debt.
  • In the past decade, personal bankruptcies have doubled.

What is Good Debt?

Good debt can be defined as an investment. Good debt like home mortgages, student or business loans are almost always a wise choice. Why? Because they generally do not lose money. Clearly the real estate crash in the United States does not back up that statement, but if you think about it, many of those people were eyeballs deep into ‘bad debt’ prior to the crash and could no longer afford that ‘good debt’. Without question, in five years most property’s will go way up in value.

College or Business loans are also a form of good debt. They are an investment on your future and if properly researched they will pay for themselves many times over. Understanding good debt and bad debt will teach you how to manage money.

Good debt also includes items that you NEED but can’t pay for up front. In these cases be certain you can make the monthly payments before you take on these kinds of debt.

What is Bad Debt?

Bad debt is buying something that loses value or will cost you more money in the future.

“When you buy something that goes down in value immediately, that’s bad debt. If it has no potential to increase in value, that’s bad debt.” (Eric Gelb, CEO of Gateway Financial Advisors and author of “Getting Started in Asset Allocation”).

Other forms of bad debt would be to buy things you don’t need and can’t pay for. On top of that, plenty of people buy these things on their credit cards and end up being un able to make the full payments. If you borrow cash to buy things such as trips, clothes or entertainment and can’t make the credit card payments you will probably pay A LOT more for that item than it’s actually worth.

How Do I Eliminate Debt?

Good debt and bad debt should not co-exist if you know how to manage money. There is an easy way to get rid of bad debt fast so you can begin to chip away at the good debt. This probably seems like it’s against all logic but attempt to do this: pay off debt of lowest value first. This is an excellent way to set goals, witness the your successes and become more motivated to eliminating your bigger debts. Keep in mind you must maintain the minimum payments on everything else. You will see the results and be that much closer to becoming free of debt.

Something we all say is: ‘I wish I could become debt free.” For most that statement is just a wish. For others it feels like an unlikely dream. For some people, becoming debt free is attainable. You can be that person! Remember what causes debt, what solutions exists in managing debt as well as understanding good debt and bad debt. There is a way to start making your debt free wish into a debt free reality.

Best regards,

Brandon

DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? SHARE IT WITH FRIENDS!

Brandon Schmid is the president of Angulus Marketing Ltd. and has spent most of his adult life studying money and how it works. His blog will help you pay off your debts and save money at the same time! Say goodbye to your boss forever! A blog that will show you the secrets of the wealthy: http://www.howtomanagemoneytips.com

When The Cashier Asks “Credit or Debit?”

When checking out at a store, a lot of people whip out their debit, or check, card. When we make payments with a debit card, we are often asked which type of transaction we’d like to make. The obvious affect is that if we choose debit, we have the ability to get cash back, but what are the differences between choosing “credit” or “debit” at the point of sale?

Either way, the funds come from the cardholder’s checking account, so the vast majority of people feel that there is no difference. However, there definitely is a difference and maybe you’ll think twice next time the cashier asks. Debit and credit transactions use two completely different processes using two different networks, and the consequences can be quite large.

When a cardholder chooses “debit” at the register, (a debit machine from Moneris, for example),the transaction is processed immediately. When the cardholder authenticates the purchase using his PIN, the funds are immediately transferred from the cardholder’s account to the merchant’s account.

When a cardholder chooses “credit,” the transaction is processed offline. The merchant may process the card to receive an authorization, thereby guaranteeing that the amount requested will be paid. However, like a normal credit card transaction, the amount is not immediately withdrawn from the cardholder’s account. This doesn’t happen until the merchant settles all of its credit card transactions, at which time the purchase amount is charged to the cardholder’s checking account. This can take up to a few days.

Debit card transactions go through an Electronic Funds Transfer system such as STAR, which doesn’t offer the protection offered by VISA or Mastercard. “Debit” transactions can be disputed, but the process is much more lengthy and time-consuming. And if you don’t report your lost card in time, it could cost you big time.

In contrast, credit transactions go through the credit network, such as VISA or MasterCard, and therefore come with the additional security credit card companies offer.

Whereas credit card purchases are governed by the Fair Credit Billing Act (which basically means you have zero liability for fraudulent purchases, poor-quality or damaged merchandise, or for merchandise that was never delivered), debit card transactions are determined by the financial institution that issued your card. And we all know how much of a pain they can be to deal with.

Another difference is that when you sign for a credit transaction, banks get a much larger percentage fee from the merchant. So it may not make much of a difference to you in a transaction, but you better believe that the extra costs trickle down to you.

Readers, now that you know, will you choose “debit” or “credit” the next time the cashier asks?

Image from stevegarfield